Analysis Of Sonnets 64 And 73 Essay

William Shakespe atomic number 18 is one of the superior playwrights of entirely fourth dimension. It is also important, however, to remember and to cultivation his sonnets. The sonnets argon separated into two groups, 1-126 and 127-54. both told of them are applaud poems of some sort, whether intercommunicate to a young man or the infamous Dark Lady. It is important to equate and analyze the sonnets, and to down the similarities between them. The adjudicate of this essay is to compare sonnets 64 and 73, and give that although it is easy to eff to the induction that they are sorrowful in savor and minus in orientation, they are truly decreed and keep affirming. These two down been chosen because they are similar in this and former(a) respects. Before discussing the similarities, however, it is necessary to briefly list what each sonnet is approximately.Sonnet 64 is a cry against the inevit able-bodied stretch of all that wears down even the to a greater int ent or less firm powers that exist in the world. The loudtalker system stresses that even the most sturdy monuments are bound to the ravages of time When I have seen by Times vaporize hand de hardihoodd/ The rich, proud cost of outworn conceal age,/ When sometime lofty towers I see down-razd/ and brass eternal striver to mortal rage and so on. It is crystalize that the speaker finds time an adversary, capable of dilapidate any efforts to persevere. Time is also the enemy to the desire to be with a hit the sack one forever.In this sonnet, the speaker finds himself at the mercy of his opponent, without any means of veneering Time with any success. He some abandons the love that he nonions because he knows that it vacate alone ultimately fall victim to time. in that location is no difference between the love that is felt by the speaker and the some other durable things in the world, such as the kingdom of the shore, and the firm soil. still even these things will erod e everywhere time. The only option the speaker has is to mourn what he will one sidereal day lose.The seventy-third sonnet is also about the answer of the speaker to the fact that Time detracts from the heroism of man and his response to the things that make him feel loved. Shakespeare places with a discussion of the process by which the things that surround man first start to erode and fall as a result of the passing of time. The speaker is liken himself toautumn and the twilight of day. He finds himself lie on the ashes of his youth, and a victim to the release of time. He cannot sustain the love that he feels, and is consumed by both time and love, as they once sustained him. The speaker is parameter that the fate of man is to be consumed by the very things that are his life-blood love and time. In me thou seest the glowing of such enhance/ That on the ashes of his youth doth lie,/ As the deathbed whereupon it essential expire/ Consumed with that which it was nourished by.The similarities between these two poems are ostensible. Basically, they are both about the speakers sense of helplessness and loss in the face of the enactment of time. The theme of loss, and the recurrent theme of impotence when faced with passing time and its effects, is evident in both poems. However, these are not necessarily sad or negativist poems. The speaker does not submit to the change all over of time by saying that he will not be able to feel or love or even live anymore. He is not depressed to the point of being unable(p) to do anything.Rather, the speaker feels that man must(prenominal) continue to love, and to live, despite the fact that life will end, and love will last subside as time takes over the human spirit. Although Time will come and take my love away, the speaker is not saying that man must simply not love at all. He is saying that man must eventually give in to the effects of time, still that in the time that does exist for man, it is affir mable to love, and to sustain oneself with that love.These poems, which sound sad or even lacking in spirit, are actually affirmative of the desire toward love and life This thou perceivest, which makes my love more strong,/ to love that well, which thou must leave ere long. Both of these sonnets can be see as encouraging the reader to dig up the fact that love can be sweeter and more enduring if the individual realizes that time will eventually take that love away. It is even possible to claim that, because all love will end, man should democracy his love early, and live that love to the fullest extent possible. In this sense, each of these poems can be understood to be positive, and life affirming.At first reading, it is easy to come to the conclusion that the poems aresorrowful in tone and negative. However, after closer analysis, it is obvious that the speaker is ultimately celebrating life, and urging the embrace of all aspects of it, whether they result in suffering or plea sure. The tone is sorrowful when the speaker comes face to face with the inevitable, but the fact ashes that the inevitable outcome, which is loss, and the passage of time, is part of what makes the fervency of love, and the quality of life, so memorable and so pleasurable.