Controversy Analysis, fracking, air pollution, gasland, Essay

hostility Analysis, fracking, air pollution, gasland, - Essay ExampleMoreover, due to the harm and damage to the environment that fracking implies, it will be the pass of this author that fracking should ultimately be suspended until a means of resource extraction that is not so horrifically damaging to the environment is found. Fracking itself is a process whereby a fluid is injected below the surface layer of thrill and situate to pressurize underlying regions of rocks to create fissures within these layers so that the trapped reserves of petroleum or natural gas may find their way into pockets and thereby be extracted via conventional means (Rijke 14). As was discussed in Gasland, due to the fact that drilling a new nearly in order to strike pockets of resources is inefficient and harmful to the environment, many resource extraction experts have turned to fracking as a ready way to help consolidate a regions gas/petroleum resources and make these amenable to fast and quite an painless extraction process. The process itself does however have its alone(predicate) drawbacks (Clean Air and Natural Gas 1). These unique drawbacks will of course be related in further detail the proceeding sections of this depth psychology. One of the main(prenominal) drawbacks to fracking, that was referenced in Gasland is of course the environmental effects that fracking entails. Although there is a high level of dissimilarity on the actual environmental damage that fracking causes, it can be understood that regardless of ones particular view of the situation fracking has the potential to unleash any one of a host of banish environmental externalities (Adgate 81) Some of these include improper disposal of waste water, overall integrity of pipeline constitution and risk of blowouts due to over pressure, affects of having fluid water pervade multiple layers of subsurface rock and sediment and thereby diffuse through these contaminating hitherto untouched samples with ke y elements and contaminants from the other subsurface aqueous layers, and the long- condition effects to health and safety of the drinking water supply as a case of the process itself (Weinhold 278). Because this process itself is extraordinarily damaging to the local environment, a number of opponents, this author included, have raise their voice with regards to seeking to suspend the process indefinitely (The Case for a Ban on Fracking 1). This intellect is not a matter of a convenient level of agreement with the documentary film Gasland earlier it is understood in this particular manner due to the host of negative implications that it entails for the environment as well as the health of the people affected by it. Due to the issues that have been listed above in this analysis as well as the fact that so little is still known regarding the long term results that fracking necessarily entails, it is in the best interest of all involved to seek to bring such a practice to a premat ure end as a means of salvaging what is left of our tender environment and ecosystems (Porter 1). As such, the reader can quickly infer that the process of fracking likely entails